Between clientelism and trust: links and relationships between individuals and local political institution.

Authors

  • Edwin Cohaila Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

Keywords:

Clientelism, institutional trust, interpersonal trust, near clientelism

Abstract

Clientelism is an asymmetrical relationship that implies certain political advantage by the authorities, but above all individuals to have certain resources. Although clientelism has an informal and illegal halo, it has enabled individuals to come closer to their institution. Trust relationships seek to establish links between individuals and their political institution, which can last, generating legitimacy, and achieving greater satisfaction with local democracy.

It tries to observe in what way both concepts are related, but above all, if through clientelistic relationships it is plausible to build trust-worthy relationships. Local political institution will be analyzed in two districts of the Lima´s same zone stratum; using qualitative and quantitative techniques. Considering also variables, such as, interpersonal trust, local democracy satisfaction, local authority behavior with local people, in order to observe if they play a role in the ways of relating between each other.

All this is evaluated in determinant and logistic models. Clientelism predominates in the way to establish links. It correlates directly with confidence. Also, clientelism can explain confidence in local political institution. And likewise, a probability of being able to trust. Therefore, to build institutional trust, there as a variety of ways that one would say "damage" the development of institutions and democracy, however, they show certain practices that formal relationships can´t accomplish between individuals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Auyero, J. (2001). La política de los pobres. Las prácticas clientelistas del peronismo. Buenos Aires: Cuadernos Argentinos Manantial

Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Berger, P. y T. Luckmann (1996). La construction sociale de la réalité. Paris : Armand Colin.

Cohaila, E. (2015). La construcción de la confianza en las instituciones políticas. Tesis de doctorado en sociología, Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Diaz Albertini, J. (2010). Redes cercanas: el capital social en Lima. Lima: Universidad de Lima.

Douglas, M. (1999). Cómo piensan las instituciones. Paris: La Découverte.

Fenoglio, J.M. (2007). Clientelismo político en instituciones del estado: unidades descentralizadas, un caso emblemático. (Tesina de Licenciatura). Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales. Universidad del Rosario, Argentina.

Fu, Q. (2004). Trust, Social Capital And Organizational Effectiveness. Tesis de maestría en Asuntos públicos e internacionales (Department Of Public And International Affairs). Virginia: Polytechnic, Blacksburg, VA.

Gambetta, D. (2000). ¿Can We Trust Trust?, En GAMBETTA, D. (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 213-237). Oxford: University of Oxford.

Giddens, A. (1993). Las consecuencias de la modernidad. Madrid: Alianza editorial.

Hopkin, J. (2006). Conceptualizing Political Clientelism: Political Exchange and Democratic Theory. Congreso Anual llevado a cabo por APSA, Filadelfia, USA.

Política, Globalidad y Ciudadanía. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León Vol. 2 Núm. 3. enero-junio 2016

Karpik, L. (1996). Dispositifs de confiance et engagements crédibles. Sociologie du travail, 4, 527-550.

Laso, E. (2010). La confianza como encrucijada: cultura, desarrollo y corrupción. Athenea Digital, 17, 97-117.

Luhmann, N. (2006). La confiance : un mécanisme de réduction de la complexité sociale. Paris : Economica

Muno, W. (2010). Conceptualizing and Measuring Clientelism. Neopatrimonialism in various world regions”. Taller llevado a cabo por GIGA, Hamburgo, Alemania.

Muñoz, P. (2013). Campaign Clientelism in Peru: an infomational theory. Tesis de doctorado. Universidad de Texas, Austin.

Rehren, A. (2000). Clientelismo político, corrupción y reforma del Estado en Chile. Documento de Trabajo preparado para la Comisión de Reforma del Estado del Centro de Estudios Públicos. Documento Nº305. Junio 2000. Pp.127-164.

Sosa, P. (2010). Los límites de la categoría clientelismo político para la comprensión de la política. Margen, 57, 1-9. Disponible en http://www.margen.org/suscri/margen57/sosa.pdf

Touraine, A. (1965). Sociologie de l’action. Paris : Seuil.

Published

2023-04-21

How to Cite

Cohaila, E. (2023). Between clientelism and trust: links and relationships between individuals and local political institution. Política, Globalidad Y Ciudadanía, 2(3), 86. Retrieved from https://revpoliticas.uanl.mx/index.php/RPGyC/article/view/46