Laboratorio del Procomún y Teoría del Actor Red: Propuesta de Aplicación al Proceso de Reforma a la Ley de Aguas en Méxic

Yolanda Alicia Villegas González

Authors

Yolanda Alicia Villegas González Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey

Keywords:

Procomú Laboratory, Actor Network Theory, Water Law, Mexico

Abstract

This text intends to encourage the use of the Mexican civil society of the “Procomún” Laboratory and of the Actor-Network Theory in order to increase and improve the citizens’ participation in relation to an issue that can be characterized both as a social matter in terms of food security governance, as well as a national security problem: the Mexican Water Law Reform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Yolanda Alicia Villegas González, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey

Estudiante del Doctorado en Estudios Humanísticos con foco en Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad del Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey. Actualmente se desempeña como Gerente Jurídico Internacional en Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V. Titular de la Comisión de Energía de la ANADE, N.L. Licenciatura y Maestría en Derecho, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey. Ha cursado diplomados en Cornell University, Harvard University, Université de la Sorbonne, y Georgetown University.

References

Beissinger, M. R. (2007). Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(2), 259-276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070776

Bunce, V., Wolchik, S. (2009). Getting real about “real causes”. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 69-73. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0063

Collier, D. y Levitsky, S. (1998). Democracia con adjetivos: innovaciones conceptuales en estudios comparativos. Agora, (8), 99-122. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/2hCfQv

Dahl, R. (1996). Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, London: Yale University.

Dimitrov, M. K. (2009). Popular Autocrats. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 78-81. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0057

Fairbanks, C. H. (2007). Revolution Reconsidered. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 42-57. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0007

Hale, H, E. (2006). Democracy or autocracy on the march? The colored revolutions as normal dynamics of patronal presidentialism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 3(39), 305-329. doi: doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.06.006

Huntington, S. (1994). La tercera ola. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Ibarra, P., Martí i Puig, S. y Gomá, R. (2002). Creadores de democracia radical. Movimientos sociales y redes de políticas públicas. Barcelona: Icaria Editoral.

Kalandadze, K., Orenstein, M. A. (2009). Electoral protests and democratization beyond the color revolutions. Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1403-1425. doi: 10.1177/0010414009332131

Linz, J. y Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Marat, E. (2006). The Tulip Revolution: Kyrgyzstan one year after. Washington DC: The Jamestown Foundation. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/gjyqoL

McFaul, M. (2005). Transitions from postcommunism. Journal of Democracy, 16(3), 5-19. Disponible en: http://goo.gl/ASTfFp

O´Donnell, G. y Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from the Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Polese, A. y Ó Beachaín, D. (2011). The color revolution, virus and authoritarian antidotes: Political protest and regime counterattacks in post-communist spaces. Demokratizatsiya, 19(2), 111-132. http://goo.gl/XLBH4k

Salomón, M. (2002). La teoría de las relaciones internacionales en los albores del siglo XXI: Diálogo, disidencia, aproximaciones. Barcelona: Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, (56), 7-52. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/xRPl6p

Schumpeter, J. (1983). Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia. Barcelona: Orbis.

Sengupta, A. (2009). Heartlands of Eurasia.The geopolitics of political space. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Silitski, V. (2010). Survival of the fittest: domestic an international dimensions of the authoritarian reaction in the former Soviet Union following the colored revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(4), 339-350. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.10.007

Skocpol, T. (1994). Social Revolutions in the Modern World. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Mcgraw-Hill College.

Tucker, J. A. (2007). Enough! Electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist colored revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(3), 535-551. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707071538

Tudoroiu, T. (2007). Rose, Orange and Tulip: the failed post—soviet revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40, 315-342. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2007.06.005

Way, L. (2008). The real causes of the color revolutions. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 259-276. Disponible en: http://goo.gl/UtvVoF