Gobernanza de la investigación científica en las universidades

Gabriela Baltodano García

doi:10.29105/rpgyc12.23-389

Authors

Gabriela Baltodano García Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rpgyc12.23-389

Keywords:

Governance, university, research

Abstract

The governance of scientific research in universities can be understood as the set of institutional arrangements, norms, organizational practices, and decision-making mechanisms that guide the type of research conducted, its priorities, the standards of quality and integrity it adheres to, and the responsibilities it bears to society (Zamora, 2017). Analytically, governance is not simply about project administration or resource management; it involves a broader architecture of authority, coordination, accountability, and legitimacy, where internal actors, such as academic bodies, authorities, scientific committees, and research offices, and external actors, such as funding agencies, regulatory frameworks, international networks, evaluation systems, and societal demands, interact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gabriela Baltodano García, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

PhD in Philosophy with a specialization in International Relations, Business, and Diplomacy. Associate Editor of the journal Política, Globalidad y Ciudadanía (Politics, Globalization, and Citizenship) and Professor at the Faculty of Political Science and International Relations of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Mexico. Member of the National System of Researchers (SNII). Research areas: University Governance and Public Policy. Contact: baltodanogabriela@gmail.com ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-4144

References

Baltodano García, G., & Martínez Garza, M. E. (2025). Educación superior y movilidad humana calificada: Desafíos de reconocimiento de títulos y trayectorias profesionales de egresados migrantes. DE JURE, 1(Especial), 8–35. Recuperado a partir de https://revistasacademicas.ucol.mx/index.php/dejure/article/view/2723

Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2016). Governing science: How science policy shapes research content. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000047

Guerrero-Vega, R. N. (2021). Los estudios de posgrados como eje primordial en la generación de investigación científica. Revista Ciencia Jurídica Y Política, 7(13), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.5377/rcijupo.v7i13.11914

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S & Rafols, I. (2025). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520, 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., Coriat, A.-M., Foeger, N., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737

Oancea, A. (2019). Research governance and the future(s) of research assessment. Palgrave Commun 5, 27. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0213-6

San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (2022). Procedimientos de gobernanza de la Declaración de San Francisco sobre la evaluación de la investigación. https://sfdora.org/governance/ (consultado el 15 de diciembre de 2025)

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Wilsdon, J. (2015). The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473978782

Zamora Sotelo, C. (2017). El Sistema Pakal como instrumento de gobernanza en materia de adquisición de bienes y servicios de tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC) en la administración pública federal: Estudio de caso aplicado en el Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) (Tesis de doctorado, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública). https://inap.mx/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/TD-AP-68142.pdf