Problemas de comunicación que afectan la adaptación de personas de origen indígena que emigran a Nuevo León

Julieta Flores Michel; Sergio G. Torres Flores; Roberto Silva Corpus

Authors

Julieta Flores Michel Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7878-0487
Sergio G. Torres Flores Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey
Roberto Silva Corpus Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey

Keywords:

communication, social adaptation, South American Indian, discrimination, urban environment

Abstract

The persons who migrate to look for new opportunities in other regions face different problems of adjustment to the new way. Already be that they migrate abroad or to other cities of his native land, from the perspective of the Communication are observed different obstacles that impede the above mentioned process. When emigrants are of indigenous origin of these problems can lead to discrimination. In this context the question was raised: What are the challenges to the adaptation of indigenous people migrating to the state of Nuevo Leon? We worked with a qualitative methodology with depth interview technique with seven families of indigenous origin rooted in Ciudad Juarez in the state of Nuevo Leon. a non-probability sampling was applied for convenience during October 2015.

The results are intended to serve as a basis to generate strategies that minimize the problems arising from cultural shock of this group of emigrants. Within the categories of analysis are the language, the use of communication technologies and discrimination. In this project students participated degree in Communication Sciences of the UANL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beissinger, M. R. (2007). Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(2), 259-276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070776

Bunce, V., Wolchik, S. (2009). Getting real about “real causes”. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 69-73. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0063

Collier, D. y Levitsky, S. (1998). Democracia con adjetivos: innovaciones conceptuales en estudios comparativos. Agora, (8), 99-122. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/2hCfQv

Dahl, R. (1996). Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, London: Yale University.

Dimitrov, M. K. (2009). Popular Autocrats. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 78-81. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0057

Fairbanks, C. H. (2007). Revolution Reconsidered. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 42-57. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0007

Hale, H, E. (2006). Democracy or autocracy on the march? The colored revolutions as normal dynamics of patronal presidentialism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 3(39), 305-329. doi: doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.06.006

Huntington, S. (1994). La tercera ola. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Ibarra, P., Martí i Puig, S. y Gomá, R. (2002). Creadores de democracia radical. Movimientos sociales y redes de políticas públicas. Barcelona: Icaria Editoral.

Kalandadze, K., Orenstein, M. A. (2009). Electoral protests and democratization beyond the color revolutions. Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1403-1425. doi: 10.1177/0010414009332131

Linz, J. y Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Marat, E. (2006). The Tulip Revolution: Kyrgyzstan one year after. Washington DC: The Jamestown Foundation. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/gjyqoL

McFaul, M. (2005). Transitions from postcommunism. Journal of Democracy, 16(3), 5-19. Disponible en: http://goo.gl/ASTfFp

O ́Donnell, G. y Schmitter, P. (1986).Transitions from the Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Polese, A. y Ó Beachaín, D. (2011). The color revolution, virus and authoritarian antidotes: Political protest and regime counterattacks in post-communist spaces. Demokratizatsiya, 19(2), 111-132. http://goo.gl/XLBH4k

Salomón, M. (2002). La teoría de las relaciones internacionales en los albores del siglo XXI: Diálogo, disidencia, aproximaciones. Barcelona: Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, (56), 7-52. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/xRPl6p

Schumpeter, J. (1983). Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia. Barcelona: Orbis.

Sengupta, A. (2009). Heartlands of Eurasia.The geopolitics of political space. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Silitski, V. (2010). Survival of the fittest: domestic an international dimensions of the authoritarian reaction in the former Soviet Union following the colored revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(4), 339-350. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.10.007

Skocpol, T. (1994). Social Revolutions in the Modern World. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Mcgraw-Hill College.

Tucker, J. A. (2007). Enough! Electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist colored revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(3), 535-551. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707071538

Tudoroiu, T. (2007). Rose, Orange and Tulip: the failed post—soviet revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40, 315-342. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2007.06.005

Way, L. (2008). The real causes of the color revolutions. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 259-276. Disponible en: http://goo.gl/UtvVoF