Right to information in Coahuila: a perspective from the constitutional justice

Abstract

Articles 46, of the Law of Access to Public Information and 9, bis of the Coahuila Notary Law, establish that public Notaries are indirect obligated subjects, because they carry out acts of authority. The general objective established the guidelines that the legislator determined the criteria that were met in the transparency obligations. The reasons expressed in the resolution were set forth through the documentary and qualitative methods, under which the constitutional examining judge of indirect amparo 186/2016, establishes that, contrary to what is expressed by the legislator, the notary cannot be considered an obligated indirect subject, since this figure does not fit into any assumption related to aid to or assistance from public entities, exercise of public spending, use or disposition of public resources, subsidies or fiscal stimuli, this form reason is understood in the sense that you do not receive a salary from the State.