Transborder cooperation for the development of sustainable cities and communities in the Tijuana - San Diego border region. Review of institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/pgc9.18-2Keywords:
international cooperation, Sustainable Development, Urban Planning, Twin Cities, Formal and Informal Institutions, Inclusive CitiesAbstract
The United Nations states that more than half of the world's population lives in cities and the number is expected to increase to 60% by 2030. A metropolitan area that has experienced an accelerated population increase is the Tijuana - San Diego region. These cities are considered twin cities due to their high interaction, joint development and interdependence. This region has a population of more than five million inhabitants, therefore the use of resources and urban needs increase with it. Sustainable development is presented as the best option to face the use of resources in a balanced way without compromising the capacity of future generations. This work has the objective of analyzing the role of transborder cooperation as a fundamental tool for the institutions that are responsible for the sustainable development of cities and communities in the Tijuana - San Diego region, through the binational activity of the institutions in the creation and implementation of urban planning instruments in the region. With the use of the qualitative method of longitudinal character. A classification of urban planning instruments in the region is made from the year 2015 and if they comply with the sustainable and binational approach.
Downloads
References
Aarts, K. (2015). The multidimensional approach to trans-border cooperation for the development of sustainable cities. In P. Driessen & P. Healey (Eds.), Sustainable Development: International Cooperation and Policies (pp. 403-422). Springer International Publishing.
Alegria, T. (2009). Metropolis Transfronteriza. El Colef.
Anthony, B., & Khanna, S. (2011). The multidimensional approach to transborder cooperation: A case study of the Mexico-USA border. International Journal of Business and Globalization, 5(3), 277-292.
Bazant, J. (2001). Lineamientos para el ordenamiento territorial de las periferias urbanas de la ciudad de México. Papéles de Población, 7(27), 143-175.
Blau, P. (1974). Presidential Address: Parameters of Social Structure. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 615-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094309
Bollard, A. E. (2017). Shifting borders: The San Diego-Tijuana region and contemporary art. University of California Press.
Brenner, N. (1999). Globalization as reterritorialization: The rescaling of urban governance. Urban Studies, 36(3), 431-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993466
California Department of Finance. (2022, January 12). E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State with Annual Percent Change. https://dof.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/Forecasting/Demographics/Documents/E-1_2022PressRelease.pdf
Castells, M. (1977). Apuntes para un análisis de clase de la política urbana del Estado mexicano. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 39(1), 179-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3539640
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Closs, J. (2017). Nueva Agenda Urbana. ONU Habitat.
Coraggio, J. L. (1979). Sobre la espacialidad social y el concepto de región. Territorios en Transición, 1, 69-107.
Cuenú, J. (2011). Perspectiva socio-fenomenológica de la estructura organizacional burocrática. Cuadernos de Administración, 24(42), 169-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25100/cdea.v27i46.90
Douglas, L., & Hansen, T. (2003). Los orígenes de la industria maquiladora en México. Comercio Exterior, 53(11), 1045-1056.
Friedman, M. (1959). A Program for Monetary Stability. Fordham University Press.
Galbraith, J. R. (1973). The structuring of organizational Structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392070
García y Griego, M. (2003). Cultural encounters: The United States and the making of the maquiladora industry. University of California Press.
García-Pérez, H. E., & Arredondo-Soto, K. (2017). Urban mobility as a way for sustainable development: Case of Nuevo León. Política, Globalidad y Ciudadanía, 5(9), 111-124.
Gomez, C. (2015). El Desarrollo Sostenible: Conceptos Básicos, Alcance y criterios para su evaluación. UNESCO.
Gómez, B., & Santome, J. (2019). La cooperación transfronteriza para el desarrollo. Universidad de Granada.
González-Romero, M. (2018). A border made of money: Time, space and labor in the maquiladora. University of Arizona Press.
Graham, S., & Healey, P. (1999). Relational Concepts of Space and Place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 7(6), 623-646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720542
Habitat, U. (2013). Sustainable Development Agenda 2030. United Nations.
Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Verso.
Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Herzog, L. (2003). Cross-Border Planning and Cooperation. San Diego.
Hewitt, K. (2018). Multidimensional approaches to transborder cooperation: Frameworks for a sustainable urban future. International Planning Studies, 23(1), 11-27.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2020). Monografías de los Estados de México: Baja California. INEGI. http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/bc/poblacion/
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2022). INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx
Karns, M., & Mingst, K. (2009). International Organizations: The Politics and Processes of Global Governance. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Madariaga, S. d. (2008). Esquinas inteligentes: La ciudad y el urbanismo moderno. Alianza.
Mouroz, J. R. (1984). La frontera México-Estados Unidos: mexicanización e internacionalización. Estudios Fronterizos, 5(9), 11-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21670/ref.1984.04-05.a01
Ornes, S. (2009). El urbanismo, la planificación urbana. Revista Politeia, 28, 197-225.
Osorio, M. (1974). Diccionario de Ciencias Jurídicas, Políticas y Sociales. Heliasta.
Peña, S. (2011). Regímenes de planificación transfronteriza: México-Estados Unidos. Región y sociedad, 23(51), 115-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2011.50.a26
Peña, S., & Drucker, B. (2019). The U.S.-Mexico border economy in transition. Routledge.
Ramirez, M., & Bandelac, L. (2019). La cooperación transfronteriza para el desarrollo. Dykinson.
Ramos-García, J. M., Barrachina-Lisón, C., & Ramos, J. E. (2020). The southern border of Mexico: problems and challenges of national security and its different dimensions. Política, Globalidad y Ciudadanía, 6(12), 145-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29105/pgc6.12-6
Rubio, F. (2009). La Estructura Organizacional en Centros de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación; una Aproximación a la Experiencia Internacional. UNAM.
SANDAG. (2020). Demographics. https://www.sandag.org/index.asp?classid=19&subclassid=40&projectid=446&fuseaction=projects.detail
SANDAG. (2021). Cross-border transportation. Retrieved from https://www.sandag.org/programs/cross_border_transportation/index.htm
SANDAG. (2022). Home. https://www.sandag.org/
Tijuana Economic Development Corporation. (2022). Mega-Region. ://www.tijuanaedc.org/mega-region/
United Nations. (2015). Objetivos de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. UN.
United States Census Bureau. (2022). Data. https://www.census.gov/data.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alejandro Monjaraz Sandoval, Ana Luisa Ramírez Soto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional.